Jackson Pollock documentary

0 Posted by - June 11, 2013 - Uncategorized

25 Comments

  • Nicola Reddwooddforest June 24, 2012 - 10:11 am Reply

    You can paint boats, too, and make that art as well. Nothing wrong with
    that. Art boats. Its great.

  • MsMissymelbourne June 25, 2012 - 9:32 pm Reply

    no.if you take your easel to the waterfront and paint a boat it means
    nothing except you like boats.”i like boats” says nothing .

  • Craig Purcell June 28, 2012 - 9:37 am Reply

    Not depicting subject matter as abstraction is too a limitation because it
    is a reaction. What of language & symbol beyond the visual field. Perhaps
    the diagram is all.

  • Iseult of the White Hands July 1, 2012 - 4:39 pm Reply

    Also It may kinda look the same all over… but it’s also kinda not… for
    sure…. SERIOUSLY. I went to art school. What? Don’t give me that look-_-
    OH YOU WAN SOME? I WILL GO FULL ABSTRACT EXPRESSIONALIST/FORMALIST ON YO
    @#$ ANY DAY. AHY DAY.

  • Galen Sherwood July 4, 2012 - 3:06 pm Reply

    Pollack came along at the right time, was aware of what was going on around
    him and had some balls. He’s not the greatest artist ever, but he’s a real
    artist. This is not a CIA “whatever.” In essence, I agree with you Hisham
    El Fangery. I still would like to resurrect Clement Greenberg so that I
    could kick him in the balls. Just my own pet peeves…

  • Hisham El Fangary July 6, 2012 - 3:41 pm Reply

    What about people who generally liked his art? Did you just discount them
    all together? I know conspiracy theories are alot more exciting than the
    boring old truth, but please give me a break with that stuff!

  • Wenceslao Futanki July 8, 2012 - 7:54 pm Reply

    Brought to you by the CIA and a bunch of rich bastards who wanted to get
    more rich thanks to their ability to mislead you!

  • Wenceslao Futanki July 9, 2012 - 12:24 pm Reply

    you got it man, but is far more complex, pollock got famous thanks to a
    conspiracy involving many actors including the CIA, most fools dont have an
    idea of this truth

  • Matt Hourigan July 11, 2012 - 9:58 pm Reply

    His technique was significant and bold at the time. Today, it would be like
    you communicating your resentment using face-to-face communication.

  • alvisc2002 July 15, 2012 - 2:36 am Reply

    it’s the one good thing about art. In that you don’t need talent to be
    successful. If you created music by randomly banging on the keys, people
    would obviously see it for the garbage that it is. But in art, you could
    actually create something like this, sip a chai latte and go
    “Flabadabadabadabadabadaaa”, and if your audience is Truly DUMB enough,
    they’ll “see it”.

  • eatpanda118 July 16, 2012 - 8:34 pm Reply

    Pollocks view points on art are so basic, and understanding. One of the
    most influential.

  • T. Aitherena July 19, 2012 - 2:30 pm Reply

    Being an influential and famous artist while alive is always complicate.
    Only some very few virtuoso can make it.

  • stay stressfree July 22, 2012 - 7:36 am Reply

    And Jackson Pollock couldn’t be me… So what’s your point?

  • Tara Johnson July 23, 2012 - 12:39 pm Reply

    I love Jackson Pollock. He’s beautiful!

  • Walker Ale July 24, 2012 - 6:50 am Reply

    good manpollock from South Pacific Islands New Zealand

  • Jennie F July 25, 2012 - 1:42 am Reply

    I have the movie, tragic.

  • vi4u July 27, 2012 - 3:56 am Reply

    But you couldn’t be Jackson Pollock.

  • D3TOSS July 29, 2012 - 2:44 pm Reply

    very good, because he was the first one who used that technique, if u would
    put paint into ur nose and really sneeze, then its pretty original, but if
    someone would just make the same paintings as him, the same moevements etc.
    then its just a copy for me.

  • DarkAlleyDigital July 30, 2012 - 7:49 pm Reply

    If somebody sneezing on a canvas is enough to be considered “just a copy”
    than honestly how good was the original it copied from?

  • MrNowaystyle August 1, 2012 - 12:25 pm Reply

    there is no darkness just low light 😉

  • D3TOSS August 4, 2012 - 9:50 am Reply

    and it would be just a copy

  • artecht August 7, 2012 - 7:10 am Reply

    Thank you, great film !

  • dave05222 August 9, 2012 - 3:22 pm Reply

    Prefer Rothko myself…..

  • edward mc August 10, 2012 - 11:15 pm Reply

    great painter

  • Lukas Hoyer August 14, 2012 - 4:01 am Reply

    Did anyone notice that everybody got to smoke in this documentary? – fuckin
    love free people smoking!

  • Leave a Reply to Galen Sherwood Cancel reply